The theory of B.F. Skinner is based upon the idea that
learning is a function of change in overt behavior. Changes in behavior are the
result of an individual's response to events (stimuli) that occur in the
environment. A response produces a consequence such as defining a word, hitting
a ball, or solving a math problem. When a particular Stimulus-Response (S-R)
pattern is reinforced (rewarded), the individual is conditioned to respond. The
distinctive characteristic of operant conditioning relative to previous forms
of behaviorism (e.g., connectionism, drive reduction) is that the organism can emit
responses instead of only eliciting response due to an external stimulus.
Reinforcement is the key element in Skinner's S-R theory. A
reinforcer is anything that strengthens the desired response. It could be
verbal praise, a good grade or a feeling of increased accomplishment or
satisfaction. The theory also covers negative reinforcers -- any stimulus that
results in the increased frequency of a response when it is withdrawn
(different from adversive stimuli -- punishment -- which result in reduced
responses). A great deal of attention was given to schedules of reinforcement
(e.g. interval versus ratio) and their effects on establishing and maintaining
behavior.
One of the distinctive aspects of Skinner's theory is that
it attempted to provide behavioral explanations for a broad range of cognitive
phenomena. For example, Skinner explained drive (motivation) in terms of deprivation
and reinforcement schedules. Skinner (1957) tried to account for verbal
learning and language within the operant conditioning paradigm, although this
effort was strongly rejected by linguists and psycholinguists. Skinner (1971)
deals with the issue of free will and social control.
Application
Operant conditioning has been widely applied in clinical
settings (i.e., behavior modification) as well as teaching (i.e., classroom
management) and instructional development (e.g., programmed instruction).
Parenthetically, it should be noted that Skinner rejected the idea of theories
of learning (see Skinner, 1950).
Example
By way of example, consider the implications of
reinforcement theory as applied to the development of programmed instruction
(Markle, 1969; Skinner, 1968)
1. Practice should take the form of question (stimulus) -
answer (response) frames which expose the student to the subject in gradual
steps
2. Require that the learner make a response for every frame
and receive immediate feedback
3. Try to arrange the difficulty of the questions so the
response is always correct and hence a positive reinforcement
4. Ensure that good performance in the lesson is paired with
secondary reinforcers such as verbal praise, prizes and good grades.
Principles
- Behavior that is positively reinforced will reoccur; intermittent reinforcement is particularly effective
- Information should be presented in small amounts so that responses can be reinforced ("shaping")
- Reinforcements will generalize across similar stimuli ("stimulus generalization") producing secondary conditioning
No comments:
Post a Comment