Construction and
Confirmation of Hypotheses
Introduction:
The formulation of hypotheses as to the possible answer to the
research question is an important step in the process of formulation of
research
problem hypotheses is usually considered as the principal instrument in research.
When research is conducted hypothesis formulation is one of the most preliminary step. Hypothesis
formulation helps in formulating research problem. Hypothesis formulation is
not a necessary but an important step of research. A valid and reasonable
research can be conducted without any hypothesis. Hypothesis can be one and it
can be as many as possible.
“A hypothesis is a proposed theory or
explanation for an observation, phenomenon or problem; which can be tested
through further study and/or experimentation”
§ A hypothesis is a logical
supposition,
§ A reasonable Guess
§ An intelligent guess
§ An educated assumption
“It provides a tentative
explanation for a phenomenon under investigation.”(Leedy and ormrod 2001)
- An hypothesis is a preliminary or tentative explanation or
postulate by the researcher of what the researcher consider the outcome of
an investigation will be it is an informed/ educated guess
- It indicated the expectation of the researcher regarding
certain variables. It is the most specific way in which an answer to a
problem can be stated
Criteria of a hypothesis:
ü Simplicity: It must be formulated in the simple term
ü Conceptual clarity: It should have defined understandable concept
ü Theoretical Relevance: It should to furnish an acceptable explanation of the phenomena
ü Testability: It must be verifiable
ü Researchability: It should correspond with existing knowledge and available
techniques
ü Specificity: It should be limited in scope and must be specific. It should state
the expected relationship between variables
ü Consistency: It should be logically consistent
ü Adequacy: It should
adequately state the size and condition of variables in a meaning full way
ü Objectivity: : it should be free from value judgment of the researcher
ü It should be tested with amenable time
WHEN IS AN HYPOTHESIS FORMULATED?
An hypothesis is formulated after the problem
has been stated and the literature study has been concluded. It is
formulated when the researcher is totally aware of the theoretical and
empirical background to the problem.
Necessary conditions to formulate the
hypothesis
Richness of background
Knowledge: observation of behavior
Classroom
teacher daily observes student behavior on the basis of experience and his
knowledge of behavior in a school situation the teacher may attempt to relate the behaviors of the
students to his own to his teaching
method to changes in the school environment and so on from observed
relationship the teacher may inductively formulate a hypothesis that attempts
to explain such relationship
Background Knowledge however is essential for perceiving
relationship among the variables and to determine what finding other
researchers have reported on the problem under the study.
Versatility of
intellect: Hypotheses
are also derived through deductive
Reasoning from a theory it is
called deductive hypothesis.
It is used to find out
the all possible information about the problem and then think liberally on it
and proceed further in the conduct of the study.
Analogy and practices:
Analogies also lead the researcher to clues that he might find
useful in the formulation of hypothesis and for finding solution to problem.
KEY OF HYPOTHESIS: These
are as follows;
a. Explanatory or Descriptive Hypothesis: A hypothesis may be about the cause of a phenomenon or
about the law of which it is an instance. A hypothesis about cause is
explanatory whereas a hypothesis about law is descriptive.
b. Tentative Hypothesis:
when a phenomenon cannot be fully understood because of technical difficulties make
tentative hypothesis about it and see how far this is successful in explaining.
Sometimes we simultaneously test two or more hypotheses. The famous hypothesis
about propagation of light namely waves theory and corpuscular theory of light
both explain the phenomenon of light but none of them are final. They are tentative.
C. Representative Fictitious Hypothesis: Some hypothesis consists of assumptions as to the certain
phenomenon; these assumptions can never be proved by direct means. Their only
merit is their suitability to express the phenomenon. They are Representative
Fiction. Einstein’s formula,
E = mc2is an instance of representative fiction. A representative
fictitious hypothesis which proves to be correct becomes a theory or law. The
law of gravitation was a hypothesis in Newton ’s
mind but when it proved to be true it became law
How to write a hypothesis?
§ Notice that these statements contain the words if and then
§ They are necessary in a
formalized hypotheses but not all if-then statements are hypotheses
§ Formalized hypotheses
contain independent and dependent variables
Construction of hypotheses: Hypotheses are guesses or tentative generalization there are no
precise rules for formulating hypotheses and deducing consequences from them that
can be empirically verified. However there are certain necessary conditions
that are conductive to their formulation
Steps in Construction and testing of hypothesis
a. Observation:
Observation is a precondition of formulation of a hypothesis. Unless perceive a
difficulty or problem and do not feel the inner goading for solving it, we do
not reflect. Therefore, observation is the first stage of hypothesis making.
b. Reflection:
Having felt a difficulty and need for a solution we consider the problem by
perceiving the relevant facts. For example, we see a sea in a high tide and
also find clear moon above. Now we anticipate a relation which is based upon
experience, namely, whenever there is high tide there is full moon and never
otherwise as far as our experience goes. Having established a relation between
two facts, we now formulate an answer for the why of this relation. This answer
is hypothesis.
c. Deduction:
The third and the last step in this process is testing of hypothesis, various
deductions possible from it and their mutual compatibilities and correspondence
with already known facts. For example, if we have a hypothesis that madness
increases with increasing complexity of civilization, it will follow from this
that there are more mad persons in New York today than in Delhi today. Now this
in fact is not true. Therefore, our hypothesis is defective, because certain
facts which follow from it are false. Thus deduction is extremely useful in
rejecting ill formed hypothesis.
d. Verification:
Actually, verification is post hypothesis formulation and therefore is not a
step in its formulation, but in as much as our interest in making hypothesis is
not purely academic or theoretical, we wish to solve our difficulty and this
difficulty can be solved, if we actually test our hypothesis.
Instructions
1)
Create your hypothesis. Try
phrasing the hypothesis as a question like "Does smoking cause lung
cancer?"
2)
Formulate the hypothesis by
making it a conditional statement like "Smoking may cause lung cancer.
3)
Write a formalized hypothesis
like "If smoking causes lung cancer, then individuals who smoke have a
higher frequency of developing the disease." This type of
"if-then" hypothesis is considered the most useful.
4)
Double-check that your
hypothesis contains variables. The researcher is in control of the independent
variable in the experiment. The dependant variable, however, is merely observed
in the context of the experiment. For an experiment to be valid, it must
contain at least two variables.
5)
Verify that your hypothesis
includes a subject group. A subject group defines who or what the researcher is
studying. In the example above, the subject group is the smokers.
6)
Include a treatment or exposure
in the experiment. A treatment is literally what is being done to the subject
group. In our example, the exposure is smoke or smoking.
7)
Prepare for an outcome measure,
which is a measurement concerned with how the treatment is going to be
assessed. The outcome measure in our smoking scenario is the frequency of
smokers developing cancer in subject population.
8)
Understand your control group.
The control group or place to is a group similar to the subject group, but this
group does not receive the treatment. It is a population that the subject group
is compared to. In the smoking example, the control group is non-smokers.
There are three important
points to formulate the hypotheses:
v It should not come to
prediction
Example:
“Ultraviolet light may cause
skin cancer”
v It should not come to
conclusion
Example;
“Ultraviolet light causes
skin cancer”
v It should be only
formalized form of hypothesis
Example:
“If skin cancer is related to ultraviolet
light then “exposing skin to ultraviolet light will result in skin cancer”
DIFFICULTIES IN FORMULATION OF HYPOTHESIS: The following are the difficulties encountered in
formulation of the hypothesis.
a. Lack of Clear theoretical background: If researcher does not have a clear cut theoretical
background then it is not easy to formulate a hypothesis
b. Lack of
Logical Background: If researcher is lacking in logical
use of the theoretical background then also formulation of hypothesis will be
very difficult.
c. Lack of Knowledge of Scientific Methods: It is always not possible to have complete information of
an acquaintance with the scientific methods for formulation of hypothesis. This
lack of scientific knowledge presents difficulty in formulation of hypothesis.
Ways and means of removal of difficulties with formulation of hypothesis Hypothesis following steps shall be taken:
1.
Complete and perfect
knowledge of the principles and practices of the discipline in which hypothesis
to be formulated has to be acquired through training, specialprogrammes,
conference, seminar etc.
2. From the very beginning the hypothesis should be brief
and timely.
3. The hypothesis should become elaborate as it proceeds in
the field of research.
CONFIRMATION OF HYPOTHESIS
A hypothesis may be directly or indirectly confirmable. It
is confirmed directly if some observation or experiment can test it. The
hypothesis that coffee taken at night makes a man sleepless can be tested by
giving coffee at night to a number of people a number of times and observing
its effect on them. Where we cannot confirm a hypothesis directly, we consider
consequences derivable from it or we may examine the validity of its opposite
consequences .
for example the law
of gravitation is not directly observable but if it is true heavy things must fall an
aero plane does not fall but an aero plane uses some special device to stay in
air therefore the law of gravitation is true
The following difficulties or shortcoming make it
unrlaiable of sensation for conformation of hypothesis
v Observation itself requires hypothesis for
interpretation of sensation and
perception
v The observation may be erroneous
v The hypothesis which directs observation also determines in
large measure what factors in the
subject matter are noted therefore the observations is unreliable
v Since the scientific
observation are carried on by the aid of instrument of such instruments must be known
v Logic of hypotheses testing:
The basic logic of
hypothesis testing is to prove or disprove the research question. By only
allowing an error of 5% or 1% and making correct decisions based on statistical
principles, the researcher can conclude that the result must be real if chance
alone could produce the same result only 5% of the time or less. These four
steps consist of all the decisions a researcher needs to make in order to
answer any research question using an inferential statistical test.
Step 1: Set the null and alternative hypotheses
Hypothesis:
The level of leadership qualities among
P.G students with regard to Gender
H1 There is significant
difference in level of leadership qualities between the male and female PG students
H0: There is no difference in level of
leadership qualities between the male
and female PG students
Step 2: Calculate the test statistic
Substitute the values for given formula we get the‘t’ value =0.60
Step 3: compute probability of test statistic or
rejection region
S.NO
|
VARIABLES
|
SUB VARIABLES
|
MEAN
|
S.D
|
N
|
‘t’VALUE
|
LEVEL OF
SIGNIFICANCE
|
1)
|
Gender
|
Male
|
114.62
|
15.33
|
114
|
0.60
|
No Significance
|
Female
|
115.629
|
11.64
|
186
|
From the above
table it is inferred that the calculated ‘t’ value 0.60 is lesser than the table’t’
value 1.98 at 0.05 level of significance. Hence the null hypothesis is
accepted
and research hypothesis is rejected it is indicates there
is no significant difference between the male and female postgraduate students
in the leadership qualities
Calculated value < 1.98 at 0.05 level (t) H0 is accepted
Calculated value >1.98 at 0.05 level (t) H0 is rejected
H1 accepted
Step 4: state Conclusion Hypothesis
According to the table the analysis shows is no significant
difference in the level of leadership qualities between the male and female PG
students the result indicates that the leadership qualities does not favor any
particular gender
Conclusion:
It is true that hypotheses are useful and they guide the
research process in the proper direction infact many experiment are carried out
with the deliberate object of testing
hypotheses. Decision-makers often face situation where in they are interested
in the testing the hypotheses on the basis of available information and then
take decision on the basis of such testing. But in all analytical and experiment
studies hypotheses should set up in order to give a proper direction to them.
The hypothesis will guide a researcher in the selection of pertinent facts that
are required to explain this issue considered of the study thus formulation of hypotheses plays an important
role in the research studies.
No comments:
Post a Comment